Stop roleplaying the tuna-stained jack Brooklyn "dissident" professor and hoping for a pat on the head from shitlib jewrnalists NY Review of Books, stop calling it "Neoliberalism." It's a meaningless term that first stood for a) a German economic school from the 1970's seeking to make Capitalism more "sensitive" to the welfare state and b) Chomsky's and other Commie Jews' attacks on Reagan and Thatcher's reforms in the early 1980's, which, while you don't have to support, you'd be a cretin to believe are the principal cause of problems at hand now, of worldwide Hutu'ism and the planned dispropriation of white middle classes worldwide. In fact much of the ideology dominant now comes from people like Rawls who are not "Neoliberals," or, if you call them this, the word lacks any meaning...which it does. We've all used this term, casual or occasional use is neither here nor there, but it's been overdone by now anyway. And I tell you that its origin and overuse, as well as its underlying assumptions, is in certain facefag pundits or pundit wannabes who want nothing more than to be fulfill the Hollywood role of "dissident leftist intellectual"...but with a NATIONALIST twist. It's all vanity. The real enemy is GLOBAL NIGGER COMMUNISM. Even someone like James Burnham could see and admit that in his time.
