๐ง๐ทโ๏ธ๐ฅ๐ โ In a clear example of the advance of censorship in Brazil, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) is set to discuss the constitutionality of Article 19 of the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet
โก๏ธ This section of the law states that, to protect freedom of expression, providers are only obligated to remove content specified in a judicial order.
โ๏ธ Experts frequently reference this article to point out alleged illegalities in decisions by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, which mandate the removal of profiles without specifying the content deemed illegal.
โ When ๐ (formerly Twitter) was blocked, the social network cited the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet to argue that Alexandre de Moraes' orders did not comply with Brazilian law. Now, Article 19 of the law, passed by Congress, could be amended or even revoked.
โก๏ธ This section of the law states that, to protect freedom of expression, providers are only obligated to remove content specified in a judicial order.
โ๏ธ Experts frequently reference this article to point out alleged illegalities in decisions by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, which mandate the removal of profiles without specifying the content deemed illegal.
โ When ๐ (formerly Twitter) was blocked, the social network cited the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet to argue that Alexandre de Moraes' orders did not comply with Brazilian law. Now, Article 19 of the law, passed by Congress, could be amended or even revoked.